47 Cal. 3d 63 - People v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 53 Cal. 3d 618 - People v. Cox (1991), 48 Cal. 3d 1194 - People v. Bloom (1989)
4 federal appellate · 64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Gates · Faretta v. California · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Lockhart v. McCree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no indication in the record that defendant was either deprived of a representative jury or that counsel's failure to challenge the jury venire was unreasonable within the meaning of either Pope, supra, ... or [ People v.] Fosselman [(1983) 33 Cal.3d 572 ]....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.