Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 CALAPP3D 465 - People v. Gordon

People v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 36 Cal. 4th 309 - People v. Wilson (2005), 3 Cal. 4th 1018 - Cummiskey v. Superior Court (1992)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

10019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Redmond · 3 Cal. 3d 421 - People v. Reilly · 53 Cal. 2d 1 - People v. Benford · People v. Megladdery · People v. Malotte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An indictment cannot be attacked either under Penal Code section 995 or following a denial of such motion on appeal from a judgment of conviction on the grounds that the grand jury was given insufficient or even inaccurate legal advice before returning an indictment. “The legal sufficiency of the evidence which underpins an indictment is reviewed by a judge of the superior court at the time of the hearing on a motion under section 995 of the Penal Code. It is this check on the grand jury’s power to indict that serves to protect a defendant against unmeritorious or legally incorrect indictments.” (Gordon, supra, 47 Cal.App.3d at p. 476 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]olicitation consists of the asking of another to commit one of the specified crimes with intent that the crime be committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.