Saxton v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1975
1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Belk v. Meagher · Beuttell v. Magone · Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co. · Dougherty v. . Village of Horseheads · 13 E.H. Smith 194 - Smith v. . Weston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the case of Michigan Home Colony v. Tabor , 141 Fed. 332 , that court, speaking through United States Circuit Judge Adams upon this proposition, said this:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parker v. Plympton“This principle is supported by a mass of cases, both from the federal and state courts, from among which we cite the following:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parker v. Plympton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.