Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 CONNAPP 1 - State v. Radzvilowicz

State v. Radzvilowicz’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
4
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo (1998), Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell (2002)

61 state decisions

370199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 26 U.S.C. § 7401 · 26 U.S.C. § 7801 · 28 U.S.C. § 1340

Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Richardson v. Marsh · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant has not pointed to any actual conflict with federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.