Das v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Peerless Insurance v. Nault · City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police Union · Middlesex Insurance v. Castellano · TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc. · City of New Haven v. Local 884, Council 4, AFSCME
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once the application has been timely filed, Practice Book § 525 [now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 23-1 ] requires that the court or judge to whom the application is made shall cause to be issued a citation directing the adverse party or parties in the arbitration proceeding to appear on a day certain and show cause, if any there be, why the application should not be granted. Neither General Statutes § 52-420 nor Practice Book § 525 [now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 23-1 ] establishes any express time limit within which the moving party must serve. notice of the motion to vacate or [confirm] and the assigned hearing date upon the nonmoving party. 6 It is elementary that the [defendant] cannot be bound by the action of the court without reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard. . . . Thus, in the absence of a specific time limit, the statute and Practice Book section are satisfied if notice was given within a reasonable time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“applications brought to confirm, modify or vacate arbitration awards are special statutory proceedings. . . . It has long been established by the courts of this state that certain statutory CT Page 11447 proceedings are not civil actions within the meaning of title 52 of the General Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Middlesex Ins. Co. v. Castellano , 225 Conn. 339 , 344 , 623 A.2d 55 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.