Byram v. Miner’s Empirical Analysis
47 F.2d 112 · 1931
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2014
7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co. · 6 E.H. Smith 521 - Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad · Gray v. . Richmond Bicycle Co. · Turner v. Stewart · Barnes v. Verry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be established, and the amount thereof determined, by the court, sum marily, in the action or proceeding, on the application of the lien claimant or of any person or party interested in the property subject to such lien * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.