Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.2d 438 - Bell v. United States

Bell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.2d 438 · 1931

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
11
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 1986 · most notably Belton v. United States (1967), Morton v. United States (1945)

18 federal appellate · 23 state decisions — followed in 11 states

100193119401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sparf v. United States · Davis v. United States · Andersen v. United States · Wallace v. United States · Eskridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t was testified by the police officers that when he made the confession to them he was ‘partially under the influence of intoxicating liquor,’ that is, ‘you could detect the odor of liquor on his breath’ and ‘his speech was sort of thick,’ but that while ‘he showed indications of having been drinking * * * he had his mental faculties and knew what he was about’; and that he ‘was not drunk, but showed plainly he had been drinking.’ One of the police officers was asked, ‘In your opinion, if he had been operating an automobile would he have been under the influence of liquor to such an extent that you would have arrested him?’ to which he answered, ‘If my attention was brought directly to the man it may be possible he would be arrested for operating an automobile while drunk.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.