Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.2d 837 - Jones v. York County

Jones v. York County’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.2d 837 · 1931

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1946
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Eliason v. Wilborn · Jones v. York County, Neb. · Ashton-Jenkins Co. v. Bramel · Drake v. Frazer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a recognized rule of construction or interpretation that the legislative intent is to be deduced from a view of the whole and every part of the statute taken and compared together, and, if possible, this act should be so construed as to render it a consistent and harmonious whole, and that construction should be favored which will render every provision operative, rather than one which would make some of its provisions idle or nugatory.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.