Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 1011 - Fikes v. Cleghorn

Fikes v. Cleghorn’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.3d 1011 · 1995

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Thomson v. Salt Lake County (2009), Amarel

50 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

470199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Tennessee v. Garner · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · James v. Arizona · Oviatt Waugh v. Pearce Oviatt Waugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fairly and adequately cover[ed] the issues presented, correctly state[d] the law, and [were] not misleading.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is reasonable under the Fourth amendment if it would seem justified to a reasonable police officer in light of the surrounding circumstances, the use of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This instruction complies with [Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989),] by focusing on the totality of the circumstances. Fikes was free to argue the three factors [mentioned specifically in Graham] as well as others to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.