Distasio v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
47 F.3d 348 · 1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2017
6 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swenson v. Sullivan · Cooper v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can testify whether particular applicants for disability benefits would be able to perform subcategories of jobs within the DOT.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause the Secretary failed to produce evidence that any job categorized as light work was available to [the claimant], but only produced evidence of sedentary work available to him,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paschall v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.