Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 569 - United States v. Studley

United States v. Studley’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.3d 569 · 1995

Citation profile

140
cited by 140 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

79 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Treadwell (2010), United States v. Campbell (2002)

79 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

6501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on Stinson v. United States · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · Invex Holdings, N.V. v. Equitable Life Insurance · United States v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “serves to differentiate between co-conspirators’ varying degrees of culpability. In order to determine the scope of the defendant’s agreement, the district court may consider any explicit agreement or implicit agreement fairly inferred from the conduct of the defendant and others.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he [district] court must first determine ... the scope of the specific conduct and objectives embraced by the defendant's agreement.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.