Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 656 - Woodall

Woodall’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2018

1 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · New York Times Company v. United States · Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. · Renne v. Geary · American Life League, Inc. v. Reno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assume that a court would issue an injunction in violation of the well-established prior restraint doctrine”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is insufficient to present the prior restraint issue in a 'clean-cut and concrete form.’”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no factual record of an actual or threatened application of the [Act's] injunctive relief provisions”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.