Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 744 - Mackey v. Dickson

Mackey v. Dickson’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.3d 744 · 1995

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Montgomery v. De Simone (1998), Harvey v. Waldron (2000)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Western District Court)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams · Gerstein v. Pugh · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Denton v. Hernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f [the plaintiff] is convicted and evidence is presented by the prosecution at his criminal trial which is a direct or indirect product of one or more of his [allegedly unlawful] arrests, then his section 1983 damage claims challenging the validity of his arrests would appear to undermine the validity of his conviction and hence be barred by Heck .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is well established that a claim of unlawful arrest, standing alone, does not necessarily implicate the validity of a criminal prosecution following the arrest.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The court may-indeed should-stay proceedings in the section 1983 case until the pending criminal case has run its course, as until that time it may be difficult to determine the relation, if any, between the two.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.