Texaco, Inc. v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
47 F.3d 765 · 1995
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Marinechance Shipping, Ltd. v. Sebastian (1998), Odeco Oil & Gas Co. v. Bonnette (1996)
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Relies on Langnes v. Green · Sweet v. United States · Providence Co v. Hill Manuf'G · Lake Tankers Corp. v. Henn · Ex parte Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may demand exoneration from as well as limitation of liability”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Exoneration is not mentioned in the Limitation Act, but the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims state that a complaint seeking limitation may also demand exoneration.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shipowners routinely seek exoneration and limitation of liability in the alternative.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.