Marcangelo v. Boardwalk Regency’s Empirical Analysis
47 F.3d 88 · 1995
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1998), Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc. (2010)
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2107
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Gooch v. Skelly Oil Co. · Hensley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. · Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court, if it finds (a) that a party entitled to notice of the entry of a judgment or order did not receive such notice from the clerk or any party within 21 days of its entry and (b) that no party would be prejudiced, may, upon motion filed within 180 days of entry of the judgment or order or within 7 days of receipt of such notice, whichever is earlier, reopen the time for appeal for a period of 14 days from the date of entry of the order reopening the time for appeal. (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.