Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 887 - Hydrite Chemical Co. v. Calumet Lubricants Co.

Hydrite Chemical Co. v. Calumet Lubricants Co.’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.3d 887 · 1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Incorporated (1995), Tas Distributing Company Incorporated v. Cummins Engine Company Incorporated (2007)

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

150199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. · Mayer v. Gary Partners & Co. · Am International Incorporated v. Graphic Management Associates Incorporated · Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc. · United States v. Hernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Tort liability requires proof ... that there was injury, regardless of how much, so that if the trial is divided, as is commonly done, between liability and damages, the fact of injury belongs in the first trial and the quantification of the injury by means of an assessment of damages in the second. Liability in a contract case ... does not depend on proof of injury. Proof of liability is complete when the breach of contract is shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fact of injury and the amount of injury. Tort liability requires proof of the first, that is, proof that there was injury, regardless of how much.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Ordinarily a party will not be heard to complain about an erroneous ruling that he himself precipitated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.