Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 F.3d 940 - Smith v. Dowden

Smith v. Dowden’s Empirical Analysis

47 F.3d 940 · 1995

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Garfield v. Jc Nichols Real Estate Jc Hornbeck J a (1995), Bonneville Associates, Limited Partnership, and MacHan Hampshire Properties, Ltd v. David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Administration (1999)

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

200199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Katchen v. Landy · Langenkamp v. Culp · Katchen v. Landy · Van-S-Aviation Corp. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] creditor may withdraw a claim as of right by filing a notice of withdrawal, except as provided in this rule. If after a creditor has filed a proof of claim an objection is filed thereto or a complaint is filed against that creditor in an adversary proceeding, or the creditor has accepted or rejected the plan or otherwise has participated significantly in the case, the creditor may not withdraw the claim except on order of the court after a hearing ...”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The effect of a voluntary dismissal without prejudice ... 'is to render the proceedings a nullity and leave the parties as if the action had never been brought'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We do not believe that our decision today will seriously impede the ability of the bankruptcy court to efficiently adjudicate claims against the bankruptcy estate. If the bankruptcy court wishes to retain jurisdiction over a claim, it need only include specific language to that effect in its order granting the creditor’s motion to withdraw his claim, or delay the dismissal of the creditor’s claim until the trustee has had an opportunity to file an adversarial claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.