United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
47 F.3d 993 · 1995
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably United States v. Velasco-Medina (2002), United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca (2011)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Nagac v. Derwinski · Cummings v. United States · United States v. Mathews · United States v. Dunn · United States v. O'Neal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a defendant pleads guilty ... to facts stated in the conjunctive, each factual allegation is taken as true.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.