Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

47 F. App'x 200

Christian v. Baskerville

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-26

Cited by 3 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Daniel A. Christian appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Christian v. Baskerville, No. CA-00-20-AM (E.D.Va. May 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/47/fappx/200 · .json · Public domain