Glass v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1464 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823
Relies on Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co · United States v. Winstar Corp. · Bowen v. United States Postal Service · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the determination of damages that requires the replacement of goodwill____ There is cost involved when something is replaced. The model must account for that. [Plaintiffs] right to use supervisory goodwill on its books was taken away by FIRREA. Damages are sought to replace that asset. Those damages cannot be calculated without accounting for the cost of replacement. Having the use of the asset and getting the cash flow it represented on the books again, is essential in valuing the asset. The transaction costs are hypothetical as is the entire model. The model represents damages, a value calculation for the usefulness of something that was contracted for, not an actual transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.