Gray v. Mann

Decided January 15, 1904

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1904-01-15

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

Relies on Haynes v. Bramlett · Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa · Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2002

5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1— Following a general verdict for the defendant, a judgment was entered for costs only. Such judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. 877; Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135, 36 South. Rep. — . Writ dismissed.

¶2Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Cockrell, JJ., concur.

¶3Carter, P. J., and Shackleford and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.