Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 FRD 213 - Fogel v. Wolfgang

Fogel v. Wolfgang’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably Miller v. Mackey International, Inc. (1971), Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin (1973)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

31019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Green v. Wolf Corp. · Dolgow v. Anderson · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Efficiency will be served by allowing plaintiffs to litigate all the complex issues common to the class, and requiring individual proofs of reliance and damages at a later stage. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to convince the Court that there is a substantial possibility that they will prevail on the merits,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.