Nedd v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2006
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1653 · 29 U.S.C. § 301
Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. · Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. · Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America · Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. PRC Pictures, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no doubt [the doctrine of law of the case applies] to situations where parties to the same case seek to do battle on the same point once more.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.