47 F. Supp. 10 - In Re Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It is within the province of the state legislature to determine the method of procedure that should be followed in procuring the confinement of persons who have become insane to such an • extent as to render them dangerous to the community, or to themselves, to be ■ at large. 'If the steps provided for by the statute of the state have not been followed, the redress of persons who have been improperly confined without warrant or authority of law is by application to the courts of the state. The federal courts ought not, except in extreme cases, if at all, be called upon to interfere. * * * It was never intended by congress that the courts of the United States should, by writs of habeas corpus, obstruct the ordinary administration of the criminal laws, or laws relating to the confinement of insane persons, through its own tribunals.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Smith v. Israel