Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 GA 297 - Whitten v. State

Whitten v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Harmelin v. Michigan (1991), Weems v. United States (1910)

2 district · 26 state decisions

80187218801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]o long as they [the General Assembly] do not provide cruel and unusual punishment, such as disgraced the civilization of former ages, and make one shudder with horror to read of them, as drawing, quartering, burning, etc., the Constitution does not put any limit upon legislative discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.