Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 ILLCTCL 55 - Toliver v. State

Toliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scroggins v. State · Baker v. State · Allen v. State · Edwards v. State · Crile v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court has consistently held that the State is not an insurer of aU persons traveling on its highways. (Edwards v. State (1984), 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 10, 15 .) However, where a dangerous condition on a State highway exists, and a person using said highway becomes involved in an accident involving the condition, that person must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that such dangerous condition existed and that the State had actual or constructive notice of it. See Scroggins v. State (1991), 43 Ill. Ct. Cl. 225 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.