Guy v. Doak’s Empirical Analysis
1891
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1930
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baker v. Administrator of Backus · Jones v. Schall · Hardy v. McClellan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This appointment of a receiver, even if one could have been appointed at any stage of the case, was absolutely void, as the bill had not been filed at the time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Brant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.