47 Kan. App. 2d 608 - State v. Teter’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on State v. McCaslin · State v. Whitesell · State v. Voyles · State v. Laturner · Smith v. Martens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'forbids the doing of an act in terms so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.' [Citations omitted.].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.