Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 LAANN 1042 - Brownson v. Weeks

Brownson v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 1980 · most notably Tillery v. Fuller (1938), Otis v. Texas Co. (1922)

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

1301895190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases in which the action of nullity or of rescission of an agreement is not limited to a shorter period by a particular law, that action may be brought within ten years.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"But, in relation to absolute nullities established in the interest of individuals, the rule is, as to onerous contracts, without exception, that the party in whose favor they are established may ratify the contracts, either expressly or impliedly. In all cases of executed contracts susceptible of tacit ratification, a presumption of ratification juris et de jure results from silence and inaction during the time fixed for prescription."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This prescription only commences against minors after their majority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.