Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 MICH 305 - Ledyard v. Phillips

Ledyard v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1983

5 state decisions

3018821890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scriven v. Moote · Ledyard v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Had a third person been the purchaser at the sale made no such question could have arisen and the present case must be disposed of precisely as though such had been the fact. The mortgagee acquires the same right and interest at the sale that a third person would, no more no less — -the only advantage he has is that to the amount of the decree in his favor he is not obliged to pay over the purchase price to that extent, his bid being a payment of his debt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.