Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

47 N.C. App. 203

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1980-06-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1987

2 state decisions

Relies on Craver v. Craver · Pruitt v. . Wood · 42 N.C. App. 724 - State v. Brown

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-06-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HILL, Judge.

¶1Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

¶2For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

¶3Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.
/47/ncapp/203 · .json · Public domain