Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 N.J. 106 - Fitzgerald v. Palmer

Fitzgerald v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
3
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Smith v. State (1976), Fuchilla v. Layman (1988)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 77 state decisions

280196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amelchenko v. Borough of Freehold · Gallena v. Scott · Baltzer v. State of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s to such matters [governmental policy decisions], the question is whether a judge or jury could review the policy or political decisions involved without in effect taking over the responsibility and power of those other branches”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... No money may be drawn from the State treasury but for appropriations made by law. Const. Art. VIII § II Para. 2. The judiciary could not order the Legislature to appropriate money, or the governor to approve an appropriation if one were not made...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to wrestle with the far-reaching proposal that the judiciary give advisory opinions to all who feel aggrieved by what the State does or does not do”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.