Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 N.J. 135 - Grober v. Kahn

Grober v. Kahn’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
4
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Gerhardt v. Continental Insurance (1966), 138 N.J. Super. 275 - Lansco, Inc v. Dept. of Environmental Protection (1975)

14 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

190196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · United States v. Equitable Trust Co. · New Jersey Highway Authority v. Renner · State v. Otis Elevator Co. · Martindell v. Martindell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, the Plaintiff contends that this proposition is apt and this Court should not stand on hypertechnicality when it is clearly outweighed by the equities of this case. Justice Jacobs has stated in Grober v. Kuhn, 47 N.J. 135, 155 , 219 A. 2d 601 (1966): A rigid approach would perhaps have been understandable in the days immediately following constitutional revision when the abuses in Chancery were viewed as a continuing threat ... In the meantime, the rule should be administered with a proper measure of equitable flexibility and with full recognition that here, as elsewhere,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]o- owners of property, as such, have a 'confidential relation' with respect to certain aspects of their common interests,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.