Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 N.M. 173 - In Re Towndrow's Will

In Re Towndrow's Will’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 1992

22 state decisions

80194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 126 Cal. App. 48 - Abels v. Frey · Barry v. Walker · In Re Morrow's Will · 116 Ohio St. 668 - Albright v. Albright · Murray v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Contest of Probate. — When a will has been approved, any person interested may at any time within six (6) months after such probate, contest the same or the validity of the will. For that purpose he shall file in the court in which the will was proved, a petition in writing, containing his allegations against the validity of the will or against the sufficiency of the proof, and praying that the probate may be revoked."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The statute confers jurisdiction upon the probate courts to probate wills and there are no parties unless by voluntary appearance some interested person should enter his appearance to contest the probate of a will. The action is in rem; the court takes jurisdiction of the script purporting to be a will.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.