Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 N.M. 345 - State v. Neville

State v. Neville’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1955
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crosby v. People · McKinney v. Dillard Coffin Company · State v. Ancheta · State v. Phipps · The People v. Makovicki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have said that there must be substantial evidence to establish that the person charged with such an offense ‘intended to have intercourse with the female by force and against her will, and that he not only used force where an assault is charged, but used such force with the intention at the time to have sexual intercourse with her in defiance of, and notwithstanding, any resistance she might make’. * * * But this is not to say that the intention which accompanied such force might not be thereafter abandoned and the force relaxed before the original purpose of the assault is achieved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.