Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 NY 360 - Austin v. . Munro

Austin v. . Munro’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
21
states following
March 1962
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 114 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently March 1962 · most notably Willis v. . Sharp (1889), Wetmore v. . Porter (1883)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 114 state decisions — followed in 21 states

3301872188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule must be regarded as well settled that the contracts of executors, although made in the interest and for the benefit of the estate they represent, if made upon a new and independent consideration, as for services rendered, goods, or property sold and delivered, or other consideration moving between the promisee and the executors as promisors, are the personal contracts of the executors, and do not bind the estate, notwithstanding the services rendered, or goods or property furnished, or other consideration moving from the promisee, are such that the executors could properly have paid for the same from the assets, and been allowed for the expenditure in the settlement of their accounts. The principle is that an executor may disburse and use the funds of the estate for purposes authorized by law, but may not bind the estate by an executory contract, and thus create a liability not founded upon a contract or obligation of the testator. * * * The rule is too well established in this state to be questioned or disregarded; and any departure from it would be mischievous.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.