Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 NY 62 - Dexter v. . Norton

Dexter v. . Norton’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
22
states following
February 1996
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1996 · most notably Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co. (1921), Stewart v. . Stone (1891)

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 76 state decisions — followed in 22 states

1801871188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The reason given for the rule is because, from the nature of the contract, it is apparent that the parties contracted on the basis of the continued existence of the particular person or thing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““But there are a variety of cases where the courts have implied a condition in the contract itself, the effect of which was to relieve the party when the performance had, without his fault, become impossible; and the apparent confusion in the authorities has grown out of the difficulty in determining in a given case whether the implication of a condition should be applied or not, and also in some cases in placing the decision upon a wrong basis. The relief afforded to the party in the cases referred to is not based upon exceptions to the general rule, but upon the construction of the contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The plaintiff would not have been obliged to accept any other cotton than the bales specified in the bought note.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.