Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Ohio App. 2d 203 - In Re Height

47 Ohio App. 2d 203 - In Re Height’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2024

23 state decisions

90197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 117 Ohio App. 374 - In Re Darst · 154 Ohio St. 296 - State Ex Rel. Clark v. Allaman · 7 Ohio App. 2d 79 - Union County Child Welfare Board v. Parker · In re Custody of Smelser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The function of a guardian ad litem or for a representative for the child is to secure for such child a proper defense or an adequate protection of its rights. The ultimate decision in any proceeding is for the judge and not for the representative of the parties and the trial court did not, for that reason, err in making an order contrary to the recommendation of the child's representative * * *.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A distinction must be made between a determination of custody in a juvenile court and a placement or disposition of a child after a finding that such child is neglected, dependent, delinquent or unruly. R.C. 3109.04 is applicable to the former and R.C. 2151.35.3, 2151.35.4, and 2151.35.5 are applicable to the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.