47 Ohio App. 2d 211 - State v. Westbrook’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The time within which an accused must be brought to trial under R. C. 2945.71 is extended ‘by any period of delay occasioned by the neglect of the accused’ (R. C. 2945.-72 H). Delay is occasioned by the neglect of an accused who fails to object to. his trial assignment, announced within rule, for a trial date commencing after the time provided for trial in R. C. 2945.71.” (Syllabus.)”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 69 Ohio App. 3d 738 - Styer v. Brichta · 52 Ohio App. 2d 9 - State v. Hafle

2. “where, within such required period, the case is set for trial for a date after the expiration of the required period, and the defendant is given ample notice thereof, he may not sit [idly] by and let the time within which he should be No. 19AP-170 15 brought to trial expire and then take advantage of the provisions of R.C. 2945.73(D).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Smith

3. ““Where a case has been set for trial on a date beyond the period required by R. C. 2945.71 and the accused has ample notice thereof, he may not sit idly by and let the time within which he should be brought to trial expire in order to take advantage of the provisions of R. C. 2945.73.” (Paragraph two of the syllabus.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 52 Ohio App. 2d 9 - State v. Hafle