47 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Vrona’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 93 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Mann (1993), 124 Ohio App. 3d 40 - State v. Hirtzinger (1997)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Maurer · State v. Smith · State v. Bridgeman · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Testimony as to a telephone call is admissible where there is a reasonable showing, through testimony or other evidence, that the witness placed or received a call as alleged, plus some indication of the identity of the person spoken to. `There is no fixed identification requirement for all calls.' * * * `Each case has its own set of facts.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'it must be demonstrated that the witness is sufficiently familiar with the operation of the business and with the circumstances of the record's preparation, maintenance and retrieval, that he can reasonably testify on the basis of this knowledge that the record is what it purports to be, and that it was made in the ordinary course of business consistent with the elements of Rule 803(6).'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.