State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

33 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “{¶ 25} “(B) An order is a final order that may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed, with or without retrial, when it is one of the following: {¶ 26} “* * * {¶ 27} “(4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both of the following apply: {¶ 28} “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect to the provisional remedy. {¶ 29} “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and parties in the action.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 153 Ohio App. 3d 271 - City of Youngstown v. Ortiz

2. ““* * * it is our opinion that the findings of a competency hearing, which is preliminary and collateral to a determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence, is not a ‘final order’ as defined in R.C. 2505.02.” (Footnote omitted.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 20 Ohio App. 3d 215 - State v. Scott