Millies v. Millies’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 136 Ohio App. 3d 211 - Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc. (2000), 124 Ohio App. 3d 525 - Vanest v. Pillsbury Co. (1997)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. · Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co. · Cedar Creek Oil & Gas Co. v. Fidelity Gas Co. · Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corp. · McClung v. Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial judge clearly declared his intention to enter a final decision in the matter before him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Subject to the provisions of Rule 54(B), upon a general verdict of a jury, or upon a decision announced, the court shall promptly cause the judgment to be prepared and, the court having signed it, the clerk shall thereupon enter it. A judgment is effective only when filed with the clerk for journalization. Entry of the judgment shall not be delayed for the taxing of costs.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““It should be sufficient to point out that the written entry prepared and filed in Shore v. Chester was identified as a ‘decision and judgment entry,’ and clearly and finally disposed of the dispute between the parties. Thus, it fulfilled the formal requirements of Civ. R. 58. * * *” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.