Casto v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1951
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re John's Will · State v. O'Day · Farrell v. Oregon Gold Co. · Weider v. Osborn · State v. Estes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon the death of any person intestate in this state, possessed of tangible goods and effects, such property passes by operation of law to his personal representative, who is entitled to the possession thereof until the administration is completed (B. & C. Comp., § 1147), and from whom only the title thereto can be derived in pursuance of orders made by the county court of the proper county in due course of administration: Winkle v. Winkle, 8 Or. 193 ; Weider v. Osborn, 20 Or. 307 ( 25 Pac. 715 ); In re John’s Will, 30 Or. 494 ( 47 Pac. 351 , 50 Pac. 226 , 36 L. R. A. 242); State v. O’Day, 41 Or. 495 ( 69 Pac. 542 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.