Sackett v. Santilli’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 84 Wash. 2d 498 - State v. Smith · M.B. & K.B. v. C.E.H. · In re Cloherty · State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior Court · 113 Wash. 2d 19 - Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Demand for Jury. At or prior to the time the case is called to be set for trial, any party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing, by filing the demand with the clerk, and by paying the jury fee required by law. If before the case is called to be set for trial no party serves or files a demand that the case be tried by a jury of twelve, it shall be tried by a jury of six members with the concurrence of five being required to reach a verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he failure of a party to [1] serve a demand as required by this rule, [2] to file it as required by this rule, and [3] to pay the jury fee required by law in accordance with this rule, constitutes a waiver by him of trial by jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saldivar v. Momah“[T]he Legislature is prohibited from delegating its purely legislative functions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mudarri v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.