Savko v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4951 · 42 U.S.C. § 4953 · 42 U.S.C. § 4954 · 42 U.S.C. § 4955 · 42 U.S.C. § 5044 · 42 U.S.C. § 5055 · 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8143
Relies on Newport Homes, Inc. v. Kassab · Travis v. Department of Public Welfare · Travis v. Department of Public Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established that duly authorized and promulgated regulations of an administrative agency have the force of law and are binding on the agency and others. [Citation omitted.] Furthermore, the establishment of these regulations involves agency discretion, and the Court will not disturb administrative discretion in the absence of fraud, bad faith or abuse of power. [Citation omitted.] The scope of review of an administrative regulation is therefore limited to a determination of whether or not there has been a clear abuse of discretion or a clearly arbitrary action . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.