Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

47 S.C.L. 213

Reid v. Reid

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1861-05-15

BEFORE INGLIS, OH., AT YORK, JUNE, I860.’ This case will be sufficiently understood from tbe. decree of his Honor, tbe Circuit Chancellor, which is as follows: Inglis, Cb. Held: and agreed with him and with each other to hold upon the same terms. If the first trust be established by competent proof, the ulterior trust need not be manifested by writing, for it results from the existence of the former by implication of law. The demand of the statute is, in the

Decided 1861-05-15

Per Curiam.

¶1This case depends upon a very remote transaction. The parol proof makes a very clear case for the complainants.

¶2The only question is upon its admissibility. The Chancellor has examined that question, and has admitted the proof upon satisfactory grounds.

¶3It is therefore ordered and decreed that his decree be affirmed.

O’Neall, C. J., Johnstone, J., and Wardlaw, J., concurring.

¶4Decree affirmed.

/47/scl/213 · .json · Public domain