Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 So. 3d 31 - State v. MEGASON

47 So. 3d 31 - State v. MEGASON’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · Goodwin v. Missouri · 936 So. 2d 108 - State v. Leger · Leger v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because specific intent is a state of mind, it does not need to be proven by fact; it may be inferred from the circumstances and the actions of the defendant. State v. Allen, 99-320 (La.App. 5 Cir. 7/27/99) , 742 So.2d 949 . The existence of specific intent is for the trier of fact to determine, and review of this determination is correctly made under the Jackson standard. Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.