Banyard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 913 So. 2d 198 - Walker v. State · 650 So. 2d 846 - Giles v. State · United States v. Harper · 297 So. 2d 888 - Pittman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant was under an unlawful and present, imminent, and impending threat of such a nature as to induce a well-grounded apprehension of death or serious bodily injury; (2) that he had not recklessly or negligently placed himself in the situation; (3) that he had no reasonable legal alternative to violating the law; (4) that a direct causal relationship may be reasonably anticipated between the criminal action and the avoidance of harm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that each party's proof-grounded theory of the case was placed before [the jury].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.