Hill v. Calderin’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 413 So. 2d 749 - Lamm v. Chapman · 850 So. 2d 682 - Kanter v. Kanter · 877 So. 2d 1147 - State v. Addison · 739 So. 2d 599 - Torres v. Torres · 967 So. 2d 435 - Howle v. Howle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, where an appellant fails to provide the appellate court with a trial transcript, the trial court's judgment must be affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (FIa.1979). Notwithstanding the absence of a transcript, however, an appellate court may review a lower court judgment for error apparent on its face.”); Connell v. Capital City Partners, LLC, 932 So.2d 442, 443-44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.