Johnson v. Star

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1932

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1932-03-23

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Johnson v. Star

Relies on Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. Cummins · Haijek & Simecek v. Luck · State v. May

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-03-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1965

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in this case, 44 S.W.(2d) 429, is in conflict with that of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in the case of Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co., 37 S.W.(2d) 776. We are convinced, however, that the opinion of the first-named court in the instant case is correct, and that the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. Cummins, 93 Tex. 598, 67 S. W. 566, and Haijek & Simecek v. Luck, 96 Tex. 517, 74 S. W. 305.

¶2We accordingly refuse the application for writ of error.